Vladimir Ryzhkov makes a rather convincing point about President Medvedev's efforts to prevent the "falsification" of history - that the best way to do this would indeed be to fully open up the Soviet archives. Sure, one could imagine that there would be some unpleasant revelations along with the exonerations - as there would be for almost any government - but fears of exposing the conduct of Russia's secret service forebearers is not sufficient reason to keep the archives under lock and key. As it currently stands, this secrecy imparts some sort of sense of guilt or shame over what resides in the archives, instead of the confidence of openness and the perspective that the Russian Federation cannot be responsible for the past conduct of the Soviet Union.
Most of the documents connected with the 1940 execution of more than 20,000 Polish officers at Katyn, which was carried out by the NKVD under direct orders from Stalin, also remain locked away. After Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and Yeltsin officially acknowledged the massacre and released many related documents from government archives, then-President Putin decided to do an about-face. The chief military prosecutor recently closed the investigation into the tragedy, and even the decision to halt criminal proceedings was deemed classified. The Kremlin's decision to sweep the matter under the carpet raises the question whether Russia really wants to break with Stalin's bloody past or whether it has a sick attachment to it. (...)
It is absurd that documents regarding the famine deaths of millions of people in 1932 and 1933 in southern Russia and Ukraine are still classified. Interestingly enough, Russia never tires of accusing Ukraine of falsifying history when Kiev claims that the Holodomor, or famine, was an act of Soviet (read: Russian) genocide against the Ukrainian people. Moscow maintains that Stalin's policy of seizing food supplies was directed against all the agricultural regions of the Soviet Union -- mainly Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan -- regardless of ethnicity. If that is the case, why doesn't the Kremlin immediately declassify those documents and expose Stalin's decisions? In this way, the Kremlin warriors for historical truth could pull the rug out from under Ukraine's allegedly "brazen attempt to falsify history."
We would do well to remember that the 1939discussions between Sir Horace Wilson and Goering's chief economic planner Wohltat remain classified to this day.
Yes, and they likewise should be made open. Or are you arguing in favor of it?