TCS Daily:
The already embattled Georgian President Mikheil "Misha" Saakashvili's ill-fortunes don't seem to be improving. In late March, Der Spiegel published a damning account of the yet-unreleased findings of the EU inquiry into the brief August war between Georgia and Russia. In short, the article places blame for the conflict most heavily upon the Georgian leadership, particularly Saakashvili. Paired with the PR blow of the New York Times' open questioning of the Georgian account in early November, there is a shifting consensus of the narrative. However, like the Times article, the circumstances of the Spiegel piece provide context for doubt and showcases more framed innuendo than evidence.
The EU-sponsored inquiry was officially announced in early December 2008 to investigate the causes of the August war in an objective manner. In a symbolic bid to highlight the commission's neutrality, Swiss veteran diplomat Heidi Tagliavini was appointed to lead the investigation. Although the final report has yet to be released, the Spiegel piece illustrates findings that explicitly lay majority blame with Georgia.
According to Spiegel, the inquiry's verdict is chiefly rooted in the existence of a rumored document known as Order Number 2. Issued on August 7, 2008 by Tbilisi, the order allegedly calls for the Georgian military to "reestablish constitutional order," which Spiegel reports as possible proof of premeditated aggression by Georgia. These same words were also uttered by Georgian General Mamuka Kurashvili on August 7th in televised remarks, and alluded to by the Russian deputy head of the general staff, Anatoly Nogovitsyn, in consultations with the EU investigation. To the commission and Spiegel, the exposure of this secret order will demonstrate that it was Georgia, and not Russia, who is guilty of aggression.



Rotfl! You really can't stand the idea that the tie-muncher was the one who got the war on this past August! Face facts-the original Western media narrative has been shot full of holes, while those who cling to it's tattered remnants are reduced to arm increasingly desperate search for a "context for doubt"! Too funny!
"ROTFL"? What, are you 13 years old or something? That would finally make sense. Funny how all these Putinistas can never make a coherent argument ... more or less like the opposite of la russophobe. yawn.
My apologies, but it was difficult to restrain my gleeful laughter at this blog, in which there was not the slightest "impartiality" or "context for doubt" last August. Though it's pathetic whining now is abundant justification for gales of ridiculing laughter, one should exercise moderation in all things.