Kremlin Declares its Sphere of Influence in Business

gazprom122508.jpgIt is rational and logical for some governments to declare certain sectors of the economy as sensitive to national security, and therefore requiring some type of overview process before allowing foreign ownership and management - defense and utilities, for example.  However in Russia, when a sector is declared as "strategic," and therefore vulnerable to arbitrary state interference, this brings an entirely different set of concerns to the equation for any foreign investors.  The Kremlin is far from unique in using strategic sector designations as a blunt instrument of protectionism - just look back at the ridiculous Dubai Ports World controversy, or even repeated attempts by the Spanish and French to block energy mergers - but they may be unique in their reputation for abuse of these regulatory privileges for private and personal gain.

But in these days of crisis, the designation of strategic enterprises is more meaningful in terms of receiving state subsidies than the restriction on foreign investment and shareholdings.  Today Reuters reports (see below) on the announcement of Russia's list for 2009.  The winners:  Gazprom, Rosneft, Aeroflot (who knows if this means Lebedev can hang on), Norilsk Nickel (same goes for the beleaguered Deripaska), and Vimpelcom.  The losers:  Polymetal and Integra.

The cabinet published the list made of 295 companies from various industries and compiled by a government commission for increasing sustainability of the economic development on its Web site late on Thursday.

Moscow has pledged over $200 billion to stave off the crisis, which has already seen companies cut jobs, salaries and investment plans, forced consolidation in Russia's 1,000-plus banking sector and prompted a rise in corporate debt defaults.

"The inclusion of a company in the list does not guarantee the receipt of the financial support," the government said in a statement on its web site www.government.ru.

"The main objective...is supporting their stability using not only credit instruments but other measures," it said adding the measures included restructuring tax arrears, altering tariff policy and granting government orders.

"Besides, if it is needed, the government will (act to) minimise negative social and economic consequences of the closure of these enterprises," the government said.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.robertamsterdam.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-t.cgi/2903

Leave a comment

Powered by Ajax Comments

Watch us on YouTube

About this Blog

This blog was created to express views which may stimulate debate and discussion on topics of international interest. I believe that we live in a world of unchallenged impunity, and this blog is ...

Continue reading...

My Firm