« Putinism without Putin? | Main | Competing Narratives of a Dual State »

Why Did the Kremlin Expel Natalia Morar?

morar1217.jpgIf I put my mind to it, I could easily draw up quite a long list of reporters and activists in Russia whom the siloviki would prefer to see exiled from the country, or worse (not to give anyone ideas...). So why, out of everyone, has the Kremlin decided to exile reporter Natalia Morar of the New Times? After all, even though the investigative articles offer great information, it is not a high circulation magazine nor all that influential. It seems that Morar, talented muckraker that she is, was into so many different stories that it is hard to tell which one triggered this harsh reaction...

Was it just about money? Morar was one of the key reporters from the New Times to break open the story about alleged money laundering involving Austria's Raiffeisen bank and the Russian government, and the possible motives behind the murder of central banker Andrei Kozlov (who was killed just five days after revoking the license from Diskont bank). See our earlier blog piece "Raiffeisen's Ties to Murder and Corruption in Russia."

Or was it just politics? She has told some sources that she was working on a major campaign finance article entitled "The Black Till of the Kremlin" which had information about a vast illegal political slush fund used to keep several parties dependent on the central authorities.

Or does her expulsion tie in to the bigger power struggle? The Wall Street Journal reported that "Ms. Morar had written extensively about alleged corruption in Russia's security services, some of which she said had been leaking incriminating information about their rivals in a power struggle between the groups. This fall, she wrote about a corruption investigation into kickback and extortion allegations against some top officials of the FSB federal security service, the successor agency to the KGB."

I suppose that there was no shortage of motivation for the siloviki to expel her, but I can't help but wonder what story she was working on that could have inspired such an embarrassing and ugly gesture from the government.... Let's hope that another brave journalist at this plucky magazine can pick up where she left off.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.robertamsterdam.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/2880

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why Did the Kremlin Expel Natalia Morar?:

» Grigory Pasko: Interview with Exiled Journalist Natalia Morari from Robert Amsterdam
[This blog has closely followed the story of the FSB's forced exile of Natalia Morari, an investigative journalist from the New Times magazine, and below we're pleased to feature a special interview with her by our correspondent Grigory Pasko. This... [Read More]

» Real vs. Rhetorical Liberalism from Robert Amsterdam
Over on the Guardian's Comment is Free, William Harrison argues that releasing Khodorkovsky and providing citizenship for New Times journalist Natalia Morar (whom we've featured quite extensively on the blog) are the two tests for Dmitry Medvedev to sh... [Read More]

» rape video from rape porn
rape porn [Read More]

» THE RAPE VIDEOS from A rape video
The rape video [Read More]

Comments (1)

I think you're falling into a rather common trap where Russia analysis is concerned, assuming that the Kremlin is fully rational and therefore there is a logical "why" answer to every question regarding its behavior.

The fact is, it isn't. No matter how long you search, you won't find a "explanation" as to why Putin would joke about rape in front of an Israeli diplomatic delegation. You won't find a "reason" why Nikita Krushchev would take off his shoe. And you won't find any "logic" that will help you "understand" the Tsar's behavior in World War II.

Irrationality is a common thread in Russian history, and the only explanation for why the country has collapsed not once but twice in the past century.

And the biggest factor underlying that irrationality is the near total failure of the West to respond to Russian outrage with appropriate and timely force. Without this, Russians have no reason to think they cannot get away with their actions, and continue them.

What has the West done to respond to this latest outrage? What, most specifically, have major Western newspapers DONE (as opposed to just SAID) to stand up for their colleague?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 17, 2007 10:46 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Putinism without Putin?.

The next post in this blog is Competing Narratives of a Dual State.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by Movable Type 3.31
Hosted by LivingDot