The Wall Street Journal is running an interesting article today about Novaya Gazeta, one of Russia's few remaining independent newspapers and the former employer of the slain journalist Anna Politkovskaya.
Some excerpts:
As opposition voices are slain, exiled or intimidated into silence, Novaya is one of the last outposts of free speech left in Russia -- a status that has earned it influential friends in the West. On a trip to Moscow in October, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice pointedly invited the paper's editors to her hotel. "I want to stress that you are not alone in your struggle," she told them.Novaya Gazeta's past isn't free of taint. Like the vast majority of Russian newspapers, it has printed articles paid for by influential politicians and businessmen, former Novaya journalists say. Today, one of its biggest fears, in an overwhelmingly pro-Putin nation, is irrelevance. The paper's strident antigovernment line puts it out of touch with the masses and the wealthy alike, leaving it to drift increasingly to the margins of Russian life. ...
More alarming, the paper's journalists were coming under physical attack. In May 2000, Igor Domnikov, whose articles alleged corruption in the southern region of Lipetsk, was beaten with a hammer in the entrance of his apartment block. Two months later he died of his injuries. His accused killers are currently on trial in central Russia, but authorities haven't said who ordered the killing.
Later that year, Ms. Politkovskaya, whose reports from Chechnya exposing atrocities committed by Russian troops led to a slew of criminal investigations, had to be placed under armed guard after receiving death threats. She was then sent into hiding abroad.
In 2003, Yuri Shchekochikhin, Novaya's deputy editor, fell ill with a mysterious ailment. A liberal lawmaker, Mr. Shchekochikhin had been investigating tax-evasion allegations against two Moscow furniture stores with links to senior figures in Russia's security services. In June, he was admitted to the hospital with an "extreme allergic syndrome." Ten days later he was dead. To this day, authorities have refused to divulge details of the autopsy, designating them a "medical secret." Family and friends insist Mr. Shchekochikhin was poisoned.
Strange incidents continued to dog Novaya's staff, especially Ms. Politkovskaya. No longer just a reporter, she was emerging as a human-rights advocate, often volunteering to help ordinary Chechens whose relatives had gone missing. That earned her enemies in Russia's security apparatus, according to colleagues. In the fall of 2004, she became violently ill and had to be hospitalized after drinking tea on a plane to southern Russia, where she was traveling to cover the Beslan hostage crisis. She claimed she had been poisoned.
Then in October this year, Ms. Politkovskaya was shot dead in the elevator of her apartment building. Before her death, she had been investigating cases of torture allegedly committed by the pro-Kremlin authorities in Chechnya.
The death reverberated around the world. Ms. Politkovskaya, 48, was the 13th reporter to be slain in a contract-style killing since Mr. Putin came to power in 2000, according to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists.
At this time, the last remnants of Russia's free press were being scooped up by Kremlin-friendly business groups. Gazprom bought Izvestia and later Komsomolskaya Pravda. A steel magnate loyal to Mr. Putin acquired Kommersant, one of Russia's last big independent newspapers.




Comments (5)
Tired of politics, Russians increasingly want lighthearted stories and more reporting on celebrities -- the kind of news Novaya's journalists disdain, although the paper does have plenty of sports coverage and a television guide. Mr. Pankin, the former Izvestia op-ed editor, says that in a country where Mr. Putin regularly scores approval ratings of over 70%, there simply aren't that many people who want to read every day about their leader's flaws.
It was a point Mr. Putin made in commenting on Anna Politkovskaya's slaying. "Her influence on Russia's political life was minimal," he said.
Says Roman Shleinov, the paper's chief investigative reporter: "Even if we were to publish pictures of Putin receiving suitcases of money at the Kremlin door, no one would care."
And therein lies the reason that democracy is not any time soon coming to Russia. You can't hold Putin exclusively accountable for re-Stalinizing Russia without holding the populace accountable too.
Posted by penny | December 8, 2006 4:45 PM
Posted on December 8, 2006 16:45
Putin is popular now, but what happens when the oil price falls? Already there are dozens of Russian companies moving their money out of the country in anticipation of the political instability surrounding the upcoming elections. There is a good piece in the new BusinessWeek about what will happen in Russia when the "good times" end. I suspect Putin's popularity will suffer in direct correlation with the economy.
Posted by Tony | December 8, 2006 4:49 PM
Posted on December 8, 2006 16:49
The more unpopular Putin becomes, the more he'll need to use force to preserve his power. But he can't afford sophisticated, subtle force like Stalin used, the economy is too weak on a per capita basis, so he naturally resorts to OBL-like terror tactics such as the killing of Politkovskaya. Clearly, his popularity is either trumped up or not enough to convince him he's safe, hence the spate of killings and the attack on the media generally. Obviously, it's a sign of weakness not strength, just like the Politburo going after Sakharov and Solzhenitsyn.
Posted by La Russophobe | December 8, 2006 11:48 PM
Posted on December 8, 2006 23:48
I agree with your points, LR, but, the hubris of the amoral Euroweenies and their need for energy keeps Putin's regime alive for now, that and the Russian's lack of respect for all of the things that you and I would die for to preserve democracy for our children.
People ultimately get the government they deserve.
I don't think oil prices will fall, Tony, in the near future, maybe never. So, Putin is a keeper for the Russia's sheeple. When times were at their worst in Poland, the Poles stayed the course in freeing themselves. How cheap and easy is it for a country to accept fascism because times are good?
Posted by penny | December 9, 2006 1:08 AM
Posted on December 9, 2006 01:08
PENNY: Actually you're just restating my point. Just because Putin is weak doens't mean he's not dangerous, especially to an emaciated Russia. But his weakness means there is a clear opportunity for action, and thus inaction, as you properly say, is all the more inexcusable as Putin gets less weak by the day.
Posted by La Russophobe | December 10, 2006 12:28 PM
Posted on December 10, 2006 12:28